<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Secuirty Update &#8211; First Hackers News</title>
	<atom:link href="https://firsthackersnews.com/category/secuirty-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://firsthackersnews.com</link>
	<description>Latest cybersecurity news, real attacks, and practical IOCs—made simple and actionable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 21:49:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Critical Splunk AI Toolkit Vulnerability Discovered</title>
		<link>https://firsthackersnews.com/splunk-ai-toolkit-vulnerability/</link>
					<comments>https://firsthackersnews.com/splunk-ai-toolkit-vulnerability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FHN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 21:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secuirty Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability Research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://firsthackersnews.com/?p=11885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Splunk has released a security update to address a critical vulnerability in its AI Toolkit that could allow</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/splunk-ai-toolkit-vulnerability/">Critical Splunk AI Toolkit Vulnerability Discovered</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Splunk has released a security update to address a critical vulnerability in its AI Toolkit that could allow attackers with administrative access to run unauthorized operating system commands on affected servers. The issue poses a significant risk to organizations that use Splunk for security monitoring, analytics, and automation.</p>



<p>Tracked as <strong>CVE-2026-20266</strong>, the vulnerability affects AI Toolkit versions prior to 5.7.4. Due to its potential impact, the flaw has received a critical severity rating and should be addressed immediately by affected organizations.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Command Injection Flaw Creates Serious Security Risk</strong></h2>



<p>The vulnerability is linked to improper handling of system commands within a configuration helper component. An attacker with Splunk administrator privileges could exploit the weakness to execute arbitrary commands directly on the host system.</p>



<p>Successful exploitation could result in:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Unauthorized command execution</li>



<li>Full system compromise</li>



<li>Manipulation or deletion of security logs</li>



<li>Service disruption and operational impact</li>



<li>Potential lateral movement across connected environments</li>
</ul>



<p>Because the flaw affects administrative functions, malicious activity may appear similar to legitimate system operations, making detection more difficult in some cases.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Additional Vulnerability and Recommended Actions</strong></h2>



<p>Alongside the critical issue, Splunk also addressed a medium-severity vulnerability that could allow low-privileged users to initiate outbound connections to untrusted external domains. This behavior may increase the risk of data exposure in environments where network traffic is not tightly restricted.</p>



<p>To reduce risk, organizations should:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Upgrade the Splunk AI Toolkit to version 5.7.4 or later</li>



<li>Review administrative account access and permissions</li>



<li>Restrict unnecessary outbound communications</li>



<li>Verify domain validation settings are properly configured</li>



<li>Remove or disable the AI Toolkit if immediate patching is not possible</li>
</ul>



<p>The disclosure highlights the growing security challenges associated with AI-enabled enterprise applications. As AI capabilities become more integrated into business platforms, maintaining strong security controls, validating inputs, and monitoring external communications remain essential for protecting critical systems.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/splunk-ai-toolkit-vulnerability/">Critical Splunk AI Toolkit Vulnerability Discovered</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://firsthackersnews.com/splunk-ai-toolkit-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>F5 NGINX Vulnerabilities Patched in Critical Security Update</title>
		<link>https://firsthackersnews.com/f5-nginx-vulnerabilities-patched/</link>
					<comments>https://firsthackersnews.com/f5-nginx-vulnerabilities-patched/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FHN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 21:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secuirty Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVE-2026-42530]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial of service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gRPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP/2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP/3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGINX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patch management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote code execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Security]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://firsthackersnews.com/?p=11881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>F5 has issued an emergency security advisory addressing several vulnerabilities affecting NGINX products and related components. The flaws</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/f5-nginx-vulnerabilities-patched/">F5 NGINX Vulnerabilities Patched in Critical Security Update</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>F5 has issued an emergency security advisory addressing several vulnerabilities affecting NGINX products and related components. The flaws could allow attackers to disrupt services, crash applications, or potentially execute malicious code in vulnerable environments.</p>



<p>The notification covers multiple products, including NGINX Open Source, NGINX Plus, NGINX Instance Manager, NGINX Gateway Fabric, NGINX Ingress Controller, and App Protect security modules. According to F5, organizations using affected versions should prioritize updates to reduce exposure to active threats.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Critical Vulnerabilities Impact HTTP/3, HTTP/2, and gRPC Services</h2>



<p>Among the most serious issues is <strong>CVE-2026-42530</strong>, a vulnerability within the NGINX HTTP/3 module. Attackers can exploit specially crafted HTTP/3 requests to trigger memory-related errors, causing worker processes to crash repeatedly. In certain environments, the flaw may also open a path for remote code execution.</p>



<p>Another high-risk vulnerability, <strong>CVE-2026-42055</strong>, affects deployments that utilize HTTP/2 or gRPC proxying. Malicious traffic can abuse weaknesses in request handling, potentially leading to service interruptions, application crashes, and in some cases, code execution risks.</p>



<p>Key concerns include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Potential remote code execution on vulnerable systems</li>



<li>Denial-of-service conditions causing service outages</li>



<li>Increased risk for environments using HTTP/3, HTTP/2, and gRPC</li>



<li>Exposure across several NGINX-based products and services</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Gateway Fabric Vulnerabilities Add Additional Risk</strong></h2>



<p>F5 also highlighted multiple high-severity vulnerabilities impacting NGINX Gateway Fabric deployments. These issues can affect traffic routing reliability, application availability, and overall service stability in cloud-native and gateway environments.</p>



<p>To address the risks, F5 has released updated versions containing security fixes and recommends that customers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Upgrade affected NGINX products immediately</li>



<li>Review exposed HTTP/2, HTTP/3, and gRPC services</li>



<li>Verify that security patches have been applied successfully</li>



<li>Update Gateway Fabric deployments to the latest supported release</li>
</ul>



<p>The advisory serves as a reminder that organizations relying on modern web application infrastructure should maintain a proactive patch management strategy, particularly when vulnerabilities affect core traffic-processing components.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><th class="has-text-align-left" data-align="left">CVE / Article</th><th class="has-text-align-left" data-align="left">CVSS v3.1</th><th class="has-text-align-left" data-align="left">CVSS v4.0</th><th class="has-text-align-left" data-align="left">Affected products</th><th class="has-text-align-left" data-align="left">Affected versions</th><th class="has-text-align-left" data-align="left">Fixed in</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CVE-2026-42530 (K000161616)</td><td>8.1 (High)</td><td>9.2 (Critical)</td><td>NGINX Open Source<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>1.31.0 – 1.31.1<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>1.31.2<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NGINX Instance Manager<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>2.17.0 – 2.22.0<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>None (no fix yet)<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NGINX Gateway Fabric<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>2.0.0 – 2.6.3, 1.3.0 – 1.6.2<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>2.6.4<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NGINX Ingress Controller<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>5.0.0 – 5.5.0, 4.0.0 – 4.0.1, 3.5.0 – 3.7.2<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>None (no fix yet)<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-42055 (K000161584)</td><td>8.1 (High)</td><td>9.2 (Critical)</td><td>NGINX Plus<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>37.0.0 – 37.0.1, R33 – R36<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>37.0.2.1, R36 P6<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NGINX Open Source<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>1.31.1, 1.30.0 – 1.30.2<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>1.31.2, 1.30.3<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NGINX Instance Manager<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>2.17.0 – 2.22.0<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>None<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>F5 WAF for NGINX</td><td>5.9.0 – 5.13.1<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>None<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NGINX App Protect WAF</td><td>5.2.0 – 5.8.0, 4.10.0 – 4.16.0<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>None<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>F5 DoS for NGINX</td><td>4.9.0<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>None<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NGINX App Protect DoS</td><td>4.3.0 – 4.7.0<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>None<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NGINX Gateway Fabric<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>2.0.0 – 2.6.3, 1.3.0 – 1.6.2<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>None<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>NGINX Ingress Controller<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>5.0.0 – 5.5.0, 4.0.0 – 4.0.1, 3.5.0 – 3.7.2<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>None<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-11311 (K000161611)</td><td>8.1 (High)<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>8.6 (High)<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>NGINX Gateway Fabric<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>2.5.0 – 2.6.3<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>2.6.4<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-50107 (K000161785)</td><td>8.1 (High)<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>8.6 (High)<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>NGINX Gateway Fabric<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>2.3.0 – 2.6.3<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000161614"></a></td><td>2.6.4</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Recommended Security Actions</h3>



<p>F5 urges customers to update affected NGINX products to the latest secure versions as soon as possible. </p>



<p>For systems that cannot be patched immediately, organizations should disable unnecessary HTTP/3 and QUIC services, limit HTTP/2 and gRPC exposure, strengthen access controls, and enable security hardening measures to reduce the risk of exploitation.<br></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/f5-nginx-vulnerabilities-patched/">F5 NGINX Vulnerabilities Patched in Critical Security Update</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://firsthackersnews.com/f5-nginx-vulnerabilities-patched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRC-Linked Threat Actors Target REDCap Servers to Spy on U.S. Medical Research Organizations</title>
		<link>https://firsthackersnews.com/prc-redcap-medical-espionage/</link>
					<comments>https://firsthackersnews.com/prc-redcap-medical-espionage/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FHN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote code execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secuirty Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INFINITERED Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Research Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRC Threat Actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNC6508]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://firsthackersnews.com/?p=11842</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>PRC-linked hackers are targeting REDCap servers to conduct cyber espionage against U.S. medical research organizations. The campaign underscores the increasing risks facing healthcare, research, and academic sectors as threat actors seek access to valuable scientific and medical data.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/prc-redcap-medical-espionage/">PRC-Linked Threat Actors Target REDCap Servers to Spy on U.S. Medical Research Organizations</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Security researchers from Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) uncovered a long-running cyber espionage campaign attributed to <strong>UNC6508</strong>, a PRC-linked threat actor that targeted medical, academic, and military research institutions across North America. The attackers remained undetected for more than a year while collecting sensitive information related to medical research, artificial intelligence, defense intelligence, cyber operations, and military strategy.</p>



<p>The campaign primarily focused on compromising <strong>REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture)</strong> servers, a widely used platform for managing clinical research databases and surveys. After gaining access, the attackers deployed custom malware called <strong>INFINITERED</strong>, harvested credentials, established persistence, and later abused enterprise email compliance rules to exfiltrate sensitive communications.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Campaign Overview</h2>



<p>The operation demonstrates a sophisticated attack chain combining exploitation of public-facing applications, credential theft, malware deployment, persistence mechanisms, and stealthy data exfiltration.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Key Objectives</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Medical research intelligence</li>



<li> Artificial Intelligence research </li>



<li>Defense-related information </li>



<li>Military health research Public health policy data</li>
</ul>



<p>Researchers observed the activity from <strong>September 2023 through November 2025</strong>, indicating a highly patient and well-resourced espionage operation.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="830" src="https://firsthackersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-05_40_14-PM-1-1024x830.png" alt="" class="wp-image-11846" style="aspect-ratio:1.233846489791462;width:606px;height:auto" srcset="https://firsthackersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-05_40_14-PM-1-177x142.png 177w, https://firsthackersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-05_40_14-PM-1-300x243.png 300w, https://firsthackersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-05_40_14-PM-1-768x622.png 768w, https://firsthackersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-05_40_14-PM-1-1024x830.png 1024w, https://firsthackersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-05_40_14-PM-1.png 1393w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>



<p>High-level attack flow used by UNC6508 to compromise research institutions and steal sensitive information.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Initial Access Through REDCap Servers</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Why REDCap Was Targeted</h3>



<p>REDCap is extensively used across:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Hospitals </li>



<li>Clinical research organizations </li>



<li>Universities </li>



<li>Government research programs </li>



<li>Military health institutions</li>
</ul>



<p>Because REDCap stores large volumes of research and patient-related information, it provides an attractive entry point for espionage-focused threat actors.</p>



<p>Researchers observed the attackers probing and exploiting vulnerable or legacy REDCap deployments exposed to the internet. Once access was obtained, they began internal reconnaissance and credential discovery activities.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Web Shell Deployment and Persistence</h2>



<p>Following successful compromise, UNC6508 deployed a web shell identified as:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>help.php</code></pre>



<p>The web shell served multiple purposes:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Persistent access </li>



<li>File uploads </li>



<li>Command execution </li>



<li>Further malware deployment</li>
</ul>



<p>This allowed the attackers to maintain long-term access even if passwords were changed or some security controls were implemented.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">INFINITERED Malware Analysis</h2>



<p>Three months after the initial intrusion, researchers observed deployment of a custom malware family called <strong>INFINITERED</strong>. This malware was specifically engineered to operate inside REDCap environments.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="819" src="https://firsthackersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-05_41_56-PM-1024x819.png" alt="" class="wp-image-11847" style="aspect-ratio:1.2495632366925407;width:599px;height:auto" srcset="https://firsthackersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-05_41_56-PM-177x142.png 177w, https://firsthackersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-05_41_56-PM-300x240.png 300w, https://firsthackersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-05_41_56-PM-768x615.png 768w, https://firsthackersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-05_41_56-PM-1024x819.png 1024w, https://firsthackersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-05_41_56-PM.png 1402w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>



<p>Modular architecture of INFINITERED malware used by UNC6508 to maintain persistence, harvest credentials, and execute commands within compromised REDCap environments.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Component 1 – Upgrade Interceptor</h2>



<p>The malware monitors REDCap upgrade activities.</p>



<p>When administrators update REDCap, the malware automatically injects itself into newer versions, ensuring persistence across software upgrades</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Component 2 – Credential Harvester</h2>



<p>This module captures usernames and passwords entered into REDCap login pages.</p>



<p>Stolen credentials are stored within REDCap database tables and later retrieved by attackers.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Component 3 – Command-and-Control Backdoor</h2>



<p>The third module acts as a fully functional backdoor.</p>



<p>Researchers found it could:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Execute shell commands </li>



<li>Upload files </li>



<li>Download files </li>



<li>Run SQL queries</li>
</ul>



<p>Communication was hidden within HTTP cookie values, helping evade traditional detection mechanisms.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Abuse of Google Workspace for Data Exfiltration</h2>



<p>One of the most interesting aspects of the campaign was the attackers&#8217; use of legitimate Google Workspace functionality.</p>



<p>After obtaining administrative access, UNC6508 created a content compliance rule named:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>Patroit</code></pre>



<p>The rule automatically monitored emails containing specific keywords and forwarded matching messages to attacker-controlled Gmail accounts.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Attack Chain Breakdown</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>External Reconnaissance</li>



<li>Initial Compromise</li>



<li>Persistence</li>



<li>Privilege Escalation</li>



<li>Intelligence Gathering</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Potential Impact on Organizations</h2>



<p>Organizations affected by this campaign could experience:</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Research Theft</h3>



<p>Loss of valuable intellectual property and scientific research.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Strategic Intelligence Exposure</h3>



<p>Disclosure of defense and geopolitical information.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Credential Compromise</h3>



<p>Unauthorized access to enterprise systems.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Regulatory Risks</h3>



<p>Exposure of regulated healthcare and research data.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Alternative Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><th>IOC Category</th><th>Description</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Web Shell</td><td>help.php</td></tr><tr><td>Malware Family</td><td>INFINITERED</td></tr><tr><td>Email Rule Name</td><td>Patroit</td></tr><tr><td>Activity</td><td>Unauthorized REDCap upgrades</td></tr><tr><td>Activity</td><td>Suspicious credential harvesting</td></tr><tr><td>Activity</td><td>Unexpected SQL queries</td></tr><tr><td>Activity</td><td>Abnormal Gmail forwarding rules</td></tr><tr><td>Activity</td><td>Unauthorized admin account access</td></tr><tr><td>Activity</td><td>HTTP cookie-based command execution</td></tr><tr><td>Activity</td><td>Unusual database access patterns</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Security Recommendations</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Upgrade REDCap Immediately</h3>



<p>Remove legacy versions and apply the latest security updates.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Conduct Threat Hunting</h3>



<p>Search for:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>help.php </li>



<li>INFINITERED artifacts </li>



<li>Unauthorized admin activity </li>



<li>Credential harvesting indicators</li>
</ul>



<p>The UNC6508 campaign highlights how modern nation-state threat actors are increasingly targeting research ecosystems to obtain strategic intelligence. By exploiting REDCap servers, deploying INFINITERED malware, and abusing legitimate cloud email features, the attackers maintained access for more than a year while collecting sensitive medical, defense, and technology research data. Organizations operating research platforms should prioritize patching, continuous monitoring, and proactive threat hunting to defend against similar espionage campaigns.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/prc-redcap-medical-espionage/">PRC-Linked Threat Actors Target REDCap Servers to Spy on U.S. Medical Research Organizations</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://firsthackersnews.com/prc-redcap-medical-espionage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer Component Flaw Enables RCE Attacks</title>
		<link>https://firsthackersnews.com/ie-security-flaw-rce/</link>
					<comments>https://firsthackersnews.com/ie-security-flaw-rce/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FHN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 18:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Application Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secuirty Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InternetExplorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security update]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://firsthackersnews.com/?p=11803</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Although Internet Explorer has been retired, some of its underlying components are still present in many Windows applications.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/ie-security-flaw-rce/">Internet Explorer Component Flaw Enables RCE Attacks</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Although Internet Explorer has been retired, some of its underlying components are still present in many Windows applications. Security researchers have now demonstrated how these legacy components can be abused to turn simple user actions into remote code execution attacks.</p>



<p>The issue involves the Internet Explorer WebBrowser control, a component still embedded in various applications built with technologies such as .NET, Visual Basic, and C++. Because it continues to inherit Internet Explorer&#8217;s security behavior, attackers may be able to abuse it to execute malicious code on a victim&#8217;s system.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How the Attack Works</strong></h2>



<p>Researchers found that the WebBrowser control still follows Internet Explorer&#8217;s security zone model, which grants additional privileges to trusted locations such as localhost and local files.</p>



<p>This becomes dangerous when desktop applications expose web interfaces through localhost. If an attacker finds a vulnerability such as cross-site scripting (XSS) in one of these applications, they may be able to move from a remote web page into a more trusted local environment.</p>



<p><strong>The attack chain can involve:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Exploiting a vulnerable localhost application</li>



<li>Downloading malicious files without standard security warnings</li>



<li>Opening local files through the WebBrowser control</li>



<li>Executing scripts in a trusted local context</li>



<li>Launching commands through insecure ActiveX components</li>
</ul>



<p>Researchers demonstrated that malicious files downloaded through certain localhost scenarios may not receive Microsoft&#8217;s Mark-of-the-Web (MOTW) protection. Without this security label, Windows may not display its usual warnings when potentially dangerous content is executed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Multiple Paths to Code Execution</strong></h2>



<p>The research also revealed several additional techniques that attackers could use to increase the chances of compromise.</p>



<p><strong>Potential attack methods include:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Abusing ActiveX components to launch programs</li>



<li>Using media playlist files to leak NTLM hashes</li>



<li>Exploiting ClickOnce and Office-related file formats</li>



<li>Using clickjacking to trick users into opening malicious files</li>



<li>Abusing drag-and-drop functionality to execute shortcuts</li>
</ul>



<p>In some proof-of-concept demonstrations, attackers used invisible frames to disguise malicious file interactions. A victim might believe they are clicking on a normal webpage when they are actually interacting with local files or applications.</p>



<p>Researchers also showed how malicious shortcuts could be disguised with trusted-looking icons and placed in locations where users are likely to interact with them.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Legacy Components Remain a Risk</strong></h2>



<p>The findings highlight a common cybersecurity challenge: retired software components can continue creating security risks long after the original product is no longer supported.</p>



<p>Many organizations still rely on applications that use the Internet Explorer WebBrowser control behind the scenes. As long as these components remain active, attackers may continue searching for ways to abuse them.</p>



<p><strong>Security experts recommend that organizations:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Identify applications using the WebBrowser control</li>



<li>Remove unnecessary legacy dependencies</li>



<li>Restrict risky ActiveX components</li>



<li>Limit exposure of localhost web interfaces</li>



<li>Monitor systems for unusual browser-based activity</li>
</ul>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/ie-security-flaw-rce/">Internet Explorer Component Flaw Enables RCE Attacks</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://firsthackersnews.com/ie-security-flaw-rce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Patches 429 Chrome Security Flaws</title>
		<link>https://firsthackersnews.com/chrome-vulnerabilities-patched/</link>
					<comments>https://firsthackersnews.com/chrome-vulnerabilities-patched/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FHN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Application Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secuirty Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googlechrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security flaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security patch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability impact]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://firsthackersnews.com/?p=11799</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Google has released Chrome 149 for Windows, macOS, and Linux, fixing a large number of security vulnerabilities across</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/chrome-vulnerabilities-patched/">Google Patches 429 Chrome Security Flaws</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Google has released Chrome 149 for Windows, macOS, and Linux, fixing a large number of security vulnerabilities across the browser. The update addresses a total of <strong>429 security issues</strong>, including <strong>22 critical vulnerabilities</strong> and several other <strong>Chrome Vulnerabilities</strong> that could potentially be exploited by attackers.</p>



<p>The latest release includes security improvements across several Chrome components, including ANGLE, GPU, Network, Ozone, FileSystem, Password Manager, Chromecast, Cast Streaming, and Chromoting.</p>



<p>Given the number and severity of the fixes, users and organizations are strongly encouraged to update their browsers as soon as possible.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Critical Bugs Could Lead to Serious Attacks</strong></h2>



<p>Many of the critical vulnerabilities are related to memory safety issues such as use-after-free and out-of-bounds memory access errors.</p>



<p>These types of flaws are frequently targeted by attackers because they can sometimes be used to:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Execute malicious code</li>



<li>Crash the browser</li>



<li>Bypass security protections</li>



<li>Access sensitive information</li>



<li>Escape browser restrictions</li>
</ul>



<p>Several of the vulnerabilities affect Chrome&#8217;s GPU and ANGLE components, which handle graphics processing and hardware acceleration. Because these components interact closely with system hardware, they are often attractive targets for threat actors.</p>



<p>Google has not released full technical details for many of the vulnerabilities yet. The company commonly delays disclosure until most users have installed the updates, reducing the risk of attackers developing exploits before systems are patched.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Multiple Browser Components Affected</strong></h2>



<p>The security fixes span a wide range of Chrome functionality.</p>



<p>Affected areas include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>ANGLE graphics framework</li>



<li>GPU processing components</li>



<li>Network services</li>



<li>Ozone platform layer</li>



<li>FileSystem functionality</li>



<li>Password management features</li>



<li>Chromecast services</li>



<li>Cast Streaming technology</li>



<li>Chrome Remote Desktop (Chromoting)</li>
</ul>



<p>Researchers warn that vulnerabilities affecting network services, file handling, and password-related components could become particularly dangerous if combined with additional exploits.</p>



<p>Issues involving Chromecast and remote streaming features also highlight that browser-related risks extend beyond simple web browsing and may impact connected devices and remote-access capabilities.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Update Recommended Immediately</strong></h2>



<p>Google reports that many of the vulnerabilities were discovered by both internal security teams and external researchers. Some high-impact findings earned bug bounty rewards of up to $97,000.</p>



<p>Organizations should prioritize deploying the latest Chrome version as part of their patch management process. Regular browser updates remain one of the most effective ways to reduce exposure to web-based attacks.</p>



<p>The release serves as another reminder that browsers remain one of the most heavily targeted applications and require continuous security updates to defend against evolving threats.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>22 Critical Vulnerabilities</strong></h3>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><th class="has-text-align-left" data-align="left">CVE ID</th><th class="has-text-align-left" data-align="left">Severity</th><th class="has-text-align-left" data-align="left">Vulnerability Type</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CVE-2026-10881</td><td>Critical</td><td>Out-of-bounds read/write</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10882</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10883</td><td>Critical</td><td>Out-of-bounds write</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10884</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10885</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10886</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10887</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10888</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10889</td><td>Critical</td><td>Out-of-bounds read</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10890</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10891</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10892</td><td>Critical</td><td>Out-of-bounds write</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10893</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10894</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10895</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10896</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10897</td><td>Critical</td><td>Out-of-bounds write</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10898</td><td>Critical</td><td>Stack buffer overflow</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10899</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10900</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10901</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr><tr><td>CVE-2026-10902</td><td>Critical</td><td>Use-after-free</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/chrome-vulnerabilities-patched/">Google Patches 429 Chrome Security Flaws</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://firsthackersnews.com/chrome-vulnerabilities-patched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware Stored XSS Flaws Put Enterprise Environments at Risk</title>
		<link>https://firsthackersnews.com/vmware-stored-xss-flaws/</link>
					<comments>https://firsthackersnews.com/vmware-stored-xss-flaws/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FHN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybercriminals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious cyber actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secuirty Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://firsthackersnews.com/?p=11794</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>VMware has disclosed three high-severity security vulnerabilities affecting VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Operations that could allow attackers to</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/vmware-stored-xss-flaws/">VMware Stored XSS Flaws Put Enterprise Environments at Risk</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>VMware has disclosed three high-severity security vulnerabilities affecting VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Operations that could allow attackers to inject malicious scripts into management interfaces.</p>



<p>The vulnerabilities, tracked as <strong>CVE-2026-41722, CVE-2026-41723, and CVE-2026-41724</strong>, were published under security advisory <strong>VMSA-2026-0004</strong> on June 8, 2026. The flaws carry a <strong>CVSS score of 8.0</strong>, highlighting the potential risk to enterprise environments running affected versions of VCF Operations.</p>



<p>Because these vulnerabilities involve stored cross-site scripting (XSS), attackers may be able to plant malicious code that executes whenever administrators access compromised sections of the platform.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How the Vulnerabilities Work</strong></h2>



<p>According to VMware, the flaws stem from improper handling of user-supplied input within VCF Operations management interfaces.</p>



<p>The platform fails to properly validate and sanitize certain data before displaying it to users. As a result, attackers can store malicious JavaScript code within the application. When an administrator or another privileged user later views the affected page, the malicious script automatically executes in their browser.</p>



<p>Unlike reflected XSS attacks, stored XSS remains embedded in the application until removed, increasing the chances of successful exploitation.</p>



<p>A successful attack could allow threat actors to:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Hijack administrator sessions</li>



<li>Steal authentication tokens</li>



<li>Access sensitive information</li>



<li>Modify configuration settings</li>



<li>Perform unauthorized actions</li>



<li>Maintain persistence within the environment</li>



<li>Potentially move deeper into connected infrastructure</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Organizations Should Take This Seriously</strong></h2>



<p>VCF Operations often serves as a central management platform for virtualization, cloud resources, and infrastructure operations. In many organizations, it integrates with other VMware services, including vCenter and cloud automation environments.</p>



<p>Because of this connectivity, a successful compromise could have broader consequences beyond a single application.</p>



<p>Security experts warn that attackers may attempt to combine these vulnerabilities with other weaknesses or misconfigurations to gain additional access and privileges across enterprise environments.</p>



<p>The risk is especially high in organizations where multiple administrators regularly access shared management consoles, as any authorized user visiting a compromised interface could unknowingly trigger the malicious code.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>No Workarounds Available</strong></h2>



<p>VMware has confirmed that there are currently <strong>no workarounds</strong> for these vulnerabilities.</p>



<p>Organizations are strongly advised to install the latest security updates as soon as possible. Delaying remediation could increase the risk of exploitation, particularly if proof-of-concept code becomes publicly available.</p>



<p>Administrators should also consider the following security measures:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Apply VMware security patches immediately</li>



<li>Restrict access to VCF Operations interfaces</li>



<li>Monitor logs for unusual activity</li>



<li>Review administrator account permissions</li>



<li>Watch for suspicious session behavior</li>



<li>Investigate unexpected script execution events</li>



<li>Strengthen overall access controls</li>
</ul>



<p>While web application firewalls and browser security controls may provide limited protection, VMware emphasizes that these measures should not replace patching.</p>



<p>The disclosure of these vulnerabilities serves as another reminder that enterprise management platforms remain valuable targets for attackers. Securing these critical control systems is essential for protecting modern virtualized and cloud-based environments.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/vmware-stored-xss-flaws/">VMware Stored XSS Flaws Put Enterprise Environments at Risk</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://firsthackersnews.com/vmware-stored-xss-flaws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stolen Gemini API Keys Power Automated Telegram Campaign</title>
		<link>https://firsthackersnews.com/stolen-gemini-api-keys/</link>
					<comments>https://firsthackersnews.com/stolen-gemini-api-keys/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FHN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Application Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secuirty Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security flaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security update]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://firsthackersnews.com/?p=11782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Researchers have uncovered a long-running operation in which a single threat actor used stolen Google Gemini API keys</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/stolen-gemini-api-keys/">Stolen Gemini API Keys Power Automated Telegram Campaign</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Researchers have uncovered a long-running operation in which a single threat actor used stolen Google Gemini API keys and modified AI tools to automate content creation, fraud activities, and online infrastructure management.</p>



<p>The campaign, linked to a Telegram channel with thousands of followers, reportedly used artificial intelligence to generate content, manage online operations, and support cybercriminal activities with very little cost or effort.</p>



<p>The case highlights how AI can be abused to increase the scale and efficiency of malicious online campaigns.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>AI Used to Automate Content and Operations</strong></h2>



<p>According to researchers, the attacker found ways to bypass Gemini&#8217;s built-in safety protections through carefully crafted prompts and configuration changes.</p>



<p>Once these restrictions were bypassed, the AI was used for a variety of tasks, including:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Generating large volumes of content</li>



<li>Automating Telegram posts</li>



<li>Managing stolen API keys</li>



<li>Assisting with infrastructure setup</li>



<li>Supporting online fraud operations</li>
</ul>



<p>Researchers found that the actor relied on dozens of stolen Gemini API keys, allowing continuous access to AI capabilities while avoiding operational costs.</p>



<p>The Telegram channel evolved over time, eventually becoming heavily dependent on AI-generated content designed to engage and influence followers.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>From Influence Campaigns to Cybercrime</strong></h2>



<p>Beyond content creation, investigators found evidence that AI was also used to assist with technical tasks often associated with cybercrime.</p>



<p>The AI reportedly helped with:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Script troubleshooting and development</li>



<li>Cloud service configuration</li>



<li>Infrastructure deployment</li>



<li>Password variation generation</li>



<li>Account compromise activities</li>
</ul>



<p>Researchers linked the operation to several compromised WordPress administrator accounts and at least one cryptocurrency theft incident.</p>



<p>The campaign also promoted a fake cryptocurrency wallet application that allegedly provided attackers with access to victim systems and digital assets.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Growing Concerns Around AI Abuse</strong></h2>



<p>Security experts believe the operation was primarily motivated by financial gain rather than political objectives.</p>



<p>The findings demonstrate how a single individual can now perform activities that previously required larger teams, thanks to automation and AI assistance.</p>



<p>At the same time, the case raises concerns about weaknesses in AI safety controls. Researchers noted that prompt manipulation, persistent jailbreak techniques, and language-based inconsistencies continue to create opportunities for abuse.</p>



<p>The incident serves as another example of how cybercriminals are adapting emerging AI technologies to support fraud, account compromise, and large-scale online influence operations.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/stolen-gemini-api-keys/">Stolen Gemini API Keys Power Automated Telegram Campaign</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://firsthackersnews.com/stolen-gemini-api-keys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meta AI Flaw Linked to Instagram Password Resets</title>
		<link>https://firsthackersnews.com/meta-ai-vulnerability-instagram/</link>
					<comments>https://firsthackersnews.com/meta-ai-vulnerability-instagram/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FHN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 22:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Application Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secuirty Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#AccountTakeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#AISecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#ArtificialIntelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#CyberNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#CyberSecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#CyberThreats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#datasecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#DigitalSecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#infosec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#Instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#InstagramSecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#MetaAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#OnlineSafety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#PasswordReset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#SecurityAwareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#SecurityResearch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#SocialMediaSecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#TechnologyNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#ThreatIntelligence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://firsthackersnews.com/?p=11778</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A recently disclosed issue involving Meta’s AI-powered support system has raised concerns about the security of Instagram accounts.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/meta-ai-vulnerability-instagram/">Meta AI Flaw Linked to Instagram Password Resets</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>A recently disclosed issue involving Meta’s AI-powered support system has raised concerns about the security of Instagram accounts. Researchers claim that attackers were able to abuse the platform’s account recovery process to request password reset codes without properly verifying ownership of the targeted account.</p>



<p>While Meta stated that its infrastructure was not breached, the incident highlights the risks of relying on AI systems for sensitive account management functions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How the Issue Worked</h2>



<p>The problem was reportedly linked to the logic used by Meta&#8217;s AI support assistant. Instead of exploiting servers or software vulnerabilities, attackers allegedly manipulated the chatbot into triggering password recovery actions.</p>



<p>According to researchers, the AI system could be persuaded to send password reset links or codes without performing sufficient identity checks. In some cases, simply knowing a target&#8217;s Instagram username may have been enough to initiate the process.</p>



<p>This type of attack is different from traditional hacking methods because it focuses on exploiting the behavior of automated systems rather than technical flaws in infrastructure.</p>



<p>Researchers noted that the issue demonstrated how AI tools can become vulnerable when strict authentication controls and security safeguards are not fully enforced.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Valuable Instagram Accounts Were Targeted</h2>



<p>Reports indicate that attackers focused primarily on high-value Instagram usernames and accounts that are often traded in underground marketplaces.</p>



<p>Short, rare, and highly desirable usernames can sell for significant amounts of money, making them attractive targets for cybercriminals.</p>



<p>Security researchers found evidence suggesting that compromised accounts were quickly offered for sale through private online channels, highlighting the growing business of account takeover operations.</p>



<p>This trend reflects an evolving cybercrime ecosystem where attackers target digital identities that can be rapidly monetized.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Meta Responds and Fixes the Issue</h2>



<p>Meta has confirmed that the problem has been addressed and stated that user accounts remain secure.</p>



<p>According to the company, the issue allowed certain password reset requests to be triggered improperly, but there was no compromise of Meta&#8217;s backend systems or customer databases.</p>



<p>The company quickly implemented a fix after receiving reports from researchers and emphasized that the vulnerability has been resolved.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Lessons for Users and Platforms</h2>



<p>The incident serves as a reminder that AI-powered support tools can introduce new security challenges if they are not carefully designed.</p>



<p>To reduce risk, organizations should implement:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Strong identity verification controls</li>



<li>Strict rate-limiting mechanisms</li>



<li>Context-aware AI decision making</li>



<li>Enhanced monitoring for abuse attempts</li>



<li>Additional safeguards for account recovery processes</li>
</ul>



<p>Researchers also noted that accounts protected with two-factor authentication (2FA) were not affected by the reported attacks.</p>



<p>As AI becomes more integrated into customer support and account management systems, security experts expect attackers to continue testing these technologies for weaknesses. Strong authentication and layered security controls remain essential for protecting user accounts from emerging threats.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/meta-ai-vulnerability-instagram/">Meta AI Flaw Linked to Instagram Password Resets</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://firsthackersnews.com/meta-ai-vulnerability-instagram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Denies Lawsuit Threats Against Researchers</title>
		<link>https://firsthackersnews.com/microsoft-security-researchers-clarification/</link>
					<comments>https://firsthackersnews.com/microsoft-security-researchers-clarification/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FHN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 21:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Application Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secuirty Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security flaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security vulnerability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://firsthackersnews.com/?p=11774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has publicly stated that it does not plan to take legal action against security researchers who responsibly</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/microsoft-security-researchers-clarification/">Microsoft Denies Lawsuit Threats Against Researchers</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Microsoft has publicly stated that it does not plan to take legal action against security researchers who responsibly discover and share vulnerabilities.</p>



<p>The statement comes after criticism from the cybersecurity community following a dispute involving a researcher known as &#8220;Nightmare-Eclipse.&#8221; Many researchers were concerned that Microsoft&#8217;s earlier comments could discourage independent security research and vulnerability disclosure.</p>



<p>The company has now clarified that its focus is on individuals who intentionally cause harm, not those conducting legitimate security research.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Dispute Sparked by Public Vulnerability Disclosures</strong></h2>



<p>The controversy began when Nightmare-Eclipse started releasing details of several previously unpatched Windows vulnerabilities, along with proof-of-concept exploit code.</p>



<p>The disclosed flaws affected important Windows security features, including Microsoft Defender and BitLocker. Some of the vulnerabilities were later confirmed to be actively exploited in real-world attacks.</p>



<p>According to the researcher, the public disclosures were driven by frustration over previous interactions with Microsoft&#8217;s vulnerability reporting process. The researcher claimed that access to Microsoft&#8217;s reporting platform had been removed and that submitted findings were not handled appropriately.</p>



<p>Microsoft later criticized the public release of unpatched vulnerabilities and stated that such disclosures could place customers at risk. The company&#8217;s comments also referenced potential legal action against individuals involved in harmful activities, which triggered widespread debate across the cybersecurity community.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Microsoft Reassures the Security Community</strong></h2>



<p>Following the backlash, Microsoft issued a new statement to clarify its position.</p>



<p>The company emphasized that it supports security research and has no intention of pursuing legal action against researchers who identify and disclose vulnerabilities. Microsoft said legal measures would only be considered in cases involving unlawful actions that cause actual harm to customers.</p>



<p>The company also acknowledged that some interactions with researchers may not have met expectations and expressed its commitment to improving communication and collaboration.</p>



<p>Microsoft reaffirmed its support for Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD), encouraging researchers to report vulnerabilities through official channels before making findings public.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Importance of Researcher-Vendor Collaboration</strong></h2>



<p>The incident highlights the delicate relationship between technology vendors and the security research community.</p>



<p>Security researchers play a critical role in identifying weaknesses before cybercriminals can exploit them. At the same time, vendors rely on responsible disclosure processes to develop patches and protect users.</p>



<p>Microsoft stated that it continues to welcome vulnerability reports through its public reporting portal and remains committed to working with researchers regardless of previous interactions.</p>



<p>The situation serves as a reminder that effective communication and cooperation between vendors and researchers are essential for improving cybersecurity and protecting users worldwide.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/microsoft-security-researchers-clarification/">Microsoft Denies Lawsuit Threats Against Researchers</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://firsthackersnews.com/microsoft-security-researchers-clarification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magento Cache Plugin Vulnerability Enables RCE Attacks</title>
		<link>https://firsthackersnews.com/magento-cache-plugin-vulnerability-rce/</link>
					<comments>https://firsthackersnews.com/magento-cache-plugin-vulnerability-rce/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FHN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberattack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybercriminals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious cyber actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secuirty Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#AdobeCommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#ApplicationSecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#CVE202645247]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#CyberAttack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#CyberSecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#CyberThreats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#datasecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#eCommerceSecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#infosec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#Magento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#MagentoSecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#PatchManagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#RCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#RemoteCodeExecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#SecurityFlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#SecurityNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#SecurityResearch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#ThreatIntelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#Vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#WebSecurity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://firsthackersnews.com/?p=11770</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A newly disclosed security vulnerability in a popular Magento caching extension could allow attackers to take complete control</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/magento-cache-plugin-vulnerability-rce/">Magento Cache Plugin Vulnerability Enables RCE Attacks</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>A newly disclosed security vulnerability in a popular Magento caching extension could allow attackers to take complete control of affected online stores.</p>



<p>The flaw, tracked as <strong>CVE-2026-45247</strong>, has received a critical severity rating and can be exploited without authentication. Security researchers warn that thousands of Magento and Adobe Commerce stores may be at risk if the vulnerable plugin remains unpatched.</p>



<p>The issue affects the Mirasvit Cache Warmer extension, a tool commonly used to improve website performance by preloading cached pages for visitors.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How the Vulnerability Works</strong></h2>



<p>The vulnerability is caused by the plugin&#8217;s unsafe handling of data stored inside a cookie called <code>CacheWarmer</code>.</p>



<p>When a visitor sends a request to the website, the extension reads information from the cookie and rebuilds session data using PHP&#8217;s <code>unserialize()</code> function. Because the cookie data is controlled by the user and is not properly validated, attackers can supply specially crafted payloads that trigger malicious object creation on the server.</p>



<p>Researchers found that this behavior opens the door to PHP Object Injection attacks, which can eventually lead to remote code execution.</p>



<p>An attacker can potentially:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Execute malicious code on the server</li>



<li>Install webshells or backdoors</li>



<li>Access sensitive store data</li>



<li>Take control of the Magento environment</li>



<li>Launch automated attacks against multiple stores</li>
</ul>



<p>The vulnerability affects all Mirasvit Cache Warmer versions released before <strong>1.11.12</strong>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Thousands of Stores Potentially Affected</strong></h2>



<p>According to researchers, the extension is frequently bundled with other Mirasvit products, meaning some store owners may not even realize it is installed on their systems.</p>



<p>Security experts estimate that more than 6,000 Magento stores may be running vulnerable components, although the actual number could be higher.</p>



<p>The vendor was notified about the issue and quickly released version <strong>1.11.12</strong>, which addresses the vulnerability.</p>



<p>Security teams should monitor web traffic for suspicious <code>CacheWarmer</code> cookie values containing unusual encoded data. Such activity could indicate attempted exploitation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Recommended Actions</strong></h2>



<p>Organizations using Magento or Adobe Commerce should act immediately to reduce risk.</p>



<p>Recommended steps include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Upgrade Mirasvit Cache Warmer to version 1.11.12 or later</li>



<li>Review web server logs for suspicious requests</li>



<li>Scan systems for webshells and backdoors</li>



<li>Inspect public-facing directories for unauthorized PHP files</li>



<li>Deploy a web application firewall for additional protection</li>



<li>Conduct a full compromise assessment if exploitation is suspected</li>
</ul>



<p>Because the flaw can be exploited remotely without authentication, researchers expect attack attempts to increase following public disclosure.</p>



<p>Store administrators are strongly encouraged to patch affected systems as soon as possible to prevent potential compromise and data theft.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com/magento-cache-plugin-vulnerability-rce/">Magento Cache Plugin Vulnerability Enables RCE Attacks</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://firsthackersnews.com">First Hackers News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://firsthackersnews.com/magento-cache-plugin-vulnerability-rce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
